|
Strong manufacturing growth - spurred by a softer rand and low interest
rates - has led to all-time high industrial property occupancy rates
and a high demand both to purchase and to let. So says Tyrone Govender,
executive director of Metboard Properties.
Govender explains that the upswing of industrial property has followed
that of retail and preceded that of commercial (office) property.
This is in contrast to the traditional pattern where industrial
property is the last sector to benefit from an upswing in the cycle.
He adds that Independent Property Databank (IPD) results for 2004 already
substantiated total returns of 24% for industrial property, hot on the
heels of retail property at 26% and steaming ahead of offices with a
total return of 16%.
After being clobbered by the strong rand, manufacturing recovered in
the second quarter of 2005, adding 1,2 percentage points to GDP growth
of 4,8%, according to an Absas economic report. The report said
capacity utilisation rose to 84% in the second quarter.
Moreover, manufacturing output data from Stats SA points to solid growth
in the third quarter growth during July and August was 2,6% and
3,5% respectively.
Also, a slightly weaker rand gave manufacturers breathing room and
boosted exports. The rand depreciated from an average of R6/$ in the
first quarter to R6,49/$ during the third quarter.
Christian Hansen, head of private clients at Provest, ascribes this
upswing to the retail boom, because the industrial sector provides logistics,
warehousing and distribution facilities to the retail sector.
Economic growth, confidence and a shortage of space brought about
by the hassles of securing industrial space have also contributed to
this trend, adds Hansen.
Alan Hendricks, head of industrial property at Broll Property group,
says the property sector in Gauteng is rapidly running out of suitable
industrial space and industrial areas are creeping closer to the urban
fringe.
Govender says demand emanates from manufacturing, wholesale and distribution
concerns. The emergence of distribution centres to meet the needs
of a growing logistics industry has provided an additional lift for
the industrial sector.
Brian Azizollahoff, CEO of Redefine Income Fund, argued there is under
supply in the right areas where there is lot of demand.
He discloses that industrial property, which has zero vacancies, makes
up 35% of the funds portfolio of R2bn.
Govender says within the Metboard portfolio, vacancies reduced from
29,000m2, equating to a mere 2.1% of the gross lettable area and has
since decreased even further to 1,5%.
Wolf Cesman, an analyst at Madison Property Fund Managers, points out
that rentals have gone up from R15/m2 when the market was flat [in 2000]
to R40/m2. Azizollahoff adds that new properties often fetch higher
rentals.
High rentals will lead to more distributions for the unitholders
of funds with exposure to the industrial market, says Cesman.
For government, industrial development results in several benefits:
it enhances the municipal rates bases, helps boost job creation and
attracts additional investment from other companies wanting a presence
in the selected areas.
Data released by Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) shows that building
plans passed for industrial and warehouse space rose 88% to R1,4bn.
There is a caveat though. Hansen pointed out that the sustainability
of these figures is questionable. Property economist François
Viruly warns that the market should be careful of an oversupply. With
building costs rising by 15 to 20%, the viability of new projects might
be affected.
Cesman concurs that high building costs may render new projects risky.
Govender argues that the market has some legs to run for a while. The
economy is sound, interest rates are low, GDP is high and industrial
property sector is linked to these variables.
|