Bond application assessments explained
Clients, says Rob Lawrence, National Manager of Rawson Finance, often ask bond originators to explain why their bond applications are declined, or why a bank will not give them the amount they requested, and makes them a lower offer.
They also ask originators to explain the terminology the banks use, such as scorecard decline or poor credit profile.
Two main sets of data go into the assessments of applicants looking for bonds on residential property, says Lawrence.
Firstly, the applicants credit profile (i.e. his track record as a payer on accounts) will be investigated. Each applicants behavioural pattern will then be scored against a number of set criteria designed to give a picture of his lifestyle and steadiness. The banks will use this to score his lifestyle risk.
If, for example, he has lived in his home for over three years that would be seen as a plus factor. If he has a landline telephone, that is too considered good. If he has been in the same job for over two years, that would be to the banks an indication of his stability and credit worthiness.
These and other factors are fed electronically into the banks rating system and can easily result in the applicant being turned away when he is in fact a good credit risk.
It is, therefore, says Lawrence, important for the applicant to talk to a bond originator who can present his case in a favourable light.
For example, the applicant may have had a promotional transfer, hence the reason for his being in a home only a few months or his previous firm, through no fault of his own, may have been liquidated or merged, forcing him to find a new job.
The electronic system does not give explanations it is a purely mechanical scorecard but a good bond originator will show the bank the other side of the story if there is one.
Applicants, said Lawrence, often think that if they reduce the size of the bond they are asking for, they will have a better chance of success but, if the scorecard behavioural findings are negative they will disqualify the applicant whatever the size of his bond request.
On the accounts side, said Lawrence, it is essential to show that no payments have been missed and to bear in mind that banks have access to credit data on all previous bonds, overdrafts, store accounts, cell phone and telephone accounts and much else.
The banks use this information to evaluate a clients payment profile to discover if he is a good or bad payer.
If he is a bad payer, no bank will want to lend him money.
Lawrence warned that if an applicant tries to hide has payment defaults, this will be discovered and it will prejudice his chances and could well cause the bank to decline him, or make him a much lower offer.
A client may have had a very good reason for going into arrears, for instance he might have run up accounts due to a divorce or have high medical bills. A good originator can motivate a bank to reconsider a credit profile decline, if there is sufficient reason to do so.
However, where credit records are not squeaky clean and the issue is the credit profile (accounts not paid regularly), our teams advice to bond applicants is to clean up all credit accounts, for at least the next six months, after which it will be possible to show the banks a positive payment profile and then re-apply for a bond.
Article by: www.rawson.co.za