|
Hot on the heels of my article last week about why it is still better
to buy than rent, the Erwin Rode website and July newsletter said the
following in their 5 July article:
"If we weren't so emotional about our homes, the best financial
decision for us to make at a time like now when real house prices are
near or at the top of the property cycle, is to sell and rent, and to
buy again when house prices are on the decline. In the meantime we would
invest the profit from the sale and the difference between our monthly
rental and the bond payments we used to make, and invest it in another
asset with higher returns.
This would make the most financial sense, says property economist Erwin
Rode, CEO of Rode & Associates. However, when it comes to residential
property, emotions play a far bigger role in buying and selling decisions
than probably any other investment decisions. "Somehow, I don't
think Mrs Rode is going to be too happy to go along with this financially
prudent plan and give up the home she has put so much into setting up",
quips Rode." http://www.rode.co.za/news/article.php?ID=2130
My Take
So the idea is to sell now and rent while investing that profit in
another investment vehicle? With apologies to Mr Rode, I have a differing
view and think that this only makes sense under a very limited number
of circumstances, which I will elaborate on later. Let's set up a hypothetical
example to work through this position.
Assumptions:
- You bought your house 3 years ago for R500 000 and it is valued
at R1 million today.
- You can rent an equivalent R1 million property for R5 000 per month.
- Your property is privately owned and profit <R1 Million so CGT
is 0%
- Transfer costs are worked out on privately owned property and not
property held in another legal entity.
So the question is: Does it make sense to sell your house and rent?
On the face of it, it looks like you'll be saving R5000 per month and
realise a handsome R500 000 profit to re-invest.
Rands and sense
In reality, if you do sell you'll make the following profit:
Purchase Price R500 000
Transfer duty * + 35 000 * tax and conveyancing costs. Approx.
Incidentals# + 5 000 # moving, deposits etc.
Total outlay R 540 000
Income derived from sale of house
Selling Price R1 000 000
Agent's fee @ 5% -50 000
Incidentals# -5 000
CGT tax payable 0
Nett Sale value R 945 000
Nett Income= Nett Sales value -Total Outlay = R945 000 - R540 000 =
R405 000.
Even if you bought another house for R1 000 000 later on when you thought
it wise to re-enter the property market (assuming that you can find
an equivalent property for R1 million) you would again have to pay the
transfer and conveyancing costs of, in this case now, approximately
R80 000. Your cash situation then is R405 000 - R80 000 or R325 000.
If you did realise your profit now and invest the R405 000 (not R325
000 because the cost of a future transfer hasn't happened yet) you would
need to make an after tax return of more than 25% or 40% before taxation
to match the R100 000 return on a 10% increase in the property market.
(Or 33% and 50% respectively if you do take the R80 000 into consideration.)
You could make more money if your alternative investment can outperform
the property market by that 500% over the same time period. (10% to
50% = 500%)
It could be true if
The very limited restrictions that make Rode's statements correct are:
- A Property Price Collapse
If you expect property prices to fall. Not if they don't keep up with
inflation, but if the values actually drop, i.e. the R1 million property
in the example drops its value to lets say R800 000. Even then the
drop in value might not offset the costs of selling and renting now
and re-purchasing at a later stage.
- New entrants
If you were thinking of buying in the current market. Then the dilemma
of choosing a different investment and ploughing the savings back
from your 'cheaper' renting lifestyle could make sense but again,
not necessarily. Go to this article at www.thepropertygame.co.za/html/cyberprop010705.htm
for more info.
Renting is better?
In terms of renting something cheaper: In our example you'd be paying
about R5000 per month repayment on a 100% bond of R500 000. If you rent
an equivalent property at R5 000 per month, you're not saving any money;
you cashflow stays exactly the same and now you're making someone else
rich.
Really?
As I asked at the outset: Does it make sense to sell your home and
rent another property and invest the proceeds somewhere else? I'm sure
you've worked out by now that you are ALREADY 'renting' a property for
R5 000 per month - your own! And you've already got your money committed
to a particular investment - your home. Your cost of living is dropping
every year in relation to inflation and an added bonus is that you will
also benefit from any further capital growth and a reduction in your
mortgage debt the longer you stay in the same property.
If the above example is worked out with a longer ownership period and
lower purchase price, the rental component gets worse as you'd be renting
at more than your bond repayment would be. Alternatively, the shorter
the ownership period is, the less the growth and subsequently the profit
to re-invest although your immediate cashflow might improve. In these
instances the frictional costs of changing homes will all but erode
your profit.
The final cost
I have left out a final cost - the cost of a divorce lawyer.
Conclusion
Thanks again to Mr Rode for the article and food for thought. I think
the point is made that the residential property market could be at a
high point and foolishly buying with unrealistic emotional expectations
instead of calculated forethought could land you in trouble. And the
people jumping into the buy-to-let market with only an eye on short-term
capital growth are in for a nasty surprise if the market doesn't continue
to perform as it has in the last 3 years.
In the final analysis, the high transaction costs of selling and purchasing
property are stumbling blocks to changing your investment strategy and
taking advantage of the low rental environment.
|