|
WHILE most South African property pundits will agree that the saying
Africa is not for sissies rings true when it comes to property
investment, some commentators believe there are major opportunities
for local property companies on the continent.
This is despite a host of problems with title deeds, property administration
and legal systems outside SA and certain other southern African states.
According to this months issue of Business in Africa, it
is estimated that sub-Saharan Africa alone is sitting on dead capital
in the form of a dysfunctional property market to the tune of $970bn.
The magazine says this figure has been widely contested but does
suggest the potential wealth that could be unlocked in Africa.
Business in Africa also reports that one major obstacle to unlocking
value is the fact that very little property in Africa is available in
clearly identified and titled individual freehold.
It reports that outside SA, Namibia and Zimbabwe, most land is state-owned,
and that it is either commonage under traditional management or available
only as a limited leasehold.
Arnold Meyer, CE of property services group Broll Property Group, which
operates in SA, Botswana, Nigeria and Namibia, says that while he agrees
with the sentiments expressed in the report, north Africa should be
excluded because these countries do have title deeds and good administrative
machinery in place.
Meyer says there are often no title deeds in place in Saharan and sub-Saharan
Africa.
In cases where title deeds do exist, it is often difficult to trace
the owners of the land.
For all African governments it is very important for them to
centralise title-deed offices, and to respect and uphold the title and
value of a title deed, says Meyer.
The Broll CE says there is a need for an effective justice system and
title-deed administrative system in Africa.
Meyer says that even if full title is not recognised, it will be acceptable
as long as the system supports and upholds 99-year lease agreements.
He says there is enormous scope for value creation in Africa,
and there are many buildings built in pre- and postcolonial times in
Africa.
But they have not been maintained and, had they been, their values
would have been much higher.
David Green, MD of Pace Property Group, says most property companies
in SA see many opportunities in the rest of Africa, particularly in
the property services arena, which includes property management, facilities
management, as well as all aspects of property development and other
professional services such as architectural and engineering.
This is largely driven by the fact that other African countries
perceive SA to be a powerhouse, and also believe that South African
companies have a better understanding of doing work in Africa than their
European counterparts, says Green.
He says problems in Africa as far as property development is concerned
relate to ownership of land because very few African countries have
well-entrenched legislation relating to ownership.
And in many countries in Africa it is only possible to obtain
land for development through leaseholds directly from governments,
says Green.
The political instability of African governments can also be perceived
by companies as a risk.
Green says economic situations can change quickly in African countries.
In many countries property development is still regarded as pioneering.
Its being done for the first time.
Having said that, certain African economies have shown substantial
growth, and so have presented very good propertyrelated opportunities
for South African property professionals.
Countries such as Angola and Mozambique in particular are attractive
because of their proximity to SA, he says.
African countries of preference include Nigeria, Senegal and Morocco.
Green says that many hotel groups are working on leisure developments
in other parts of Africa such as Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Madagascar.
Developments under way in west Africa include commercial, industrial
and retail properties.
|