|
Rapidly rising building prices could begin to distort demand and supply
patterns in the property market, cautions ERA South Africa group CEO,
Gerhard Kotzé.
Building cost inputs are rising rapidly and in most instances
well beyond the inflation rate. Indeed, the Bureau for Economic Research
(BER) has reported that building costs rose 13,5 percent in the last
quarter of 2004, although the CPIX inflation rate for December was just
4,3 percent.
And this scenario does reflect, to some extent, a correction
of the situation before the onset of the current building boom, when
the construction sector was in the doldrums and both suppliers and developers
were forced to keep a tight lid on price increases.
There are obviously few such constraints at present, with demand for
cement having risen 18,2 percent in the first 11 months of last year
according to the Cement and Concrete Institute, brick sales last year
being the best since 1989 according to the Brick Association, and excellent
financial results being reported by building material manufacturers
and suppliers.
There is a danger, however, that rapid increases in building costs
could engender consumer resistance and ultimately cause a further narrowing
of the traditional price gap between established and newly built homes.
The latest Absa figures show that the nominal price difference between
new and existing houses was about 12,8 percent in the fourth quarter
of 2004 - the smallest difference since the 13,1 percent recorded in
the fourth quarter of 1989.
What is more, the price difference between new and existing houses
has shown a steadily declining trend since the first quarter of 2003,
when it reached a record high of 31,4 percent.
Such declines in the differential generally occur, Kotze
explains, when consumers resisting high building costs decide
to buy pre-owned rather than newly-built homes and cause prices in the
pre-owned sector to rise steeply as demand exceeds supply.
And there is historic precedent for what I believe could now
be happening. Absa research shows that, at the peak of the property
boom in the early 1980s, the price differential between old and
new homes had declined to almost zero.
And as a concerned observer and participant in the property industry,
the ERA group would suggest that there is a need for caution now as
regards the potential impact of rising building input costs.
If the market is to grow on a sound basis, the overall plateau
of prices needs to move upwards on a broad, steady basis, maintaining
the new-to-old price differential, and it makes sense for material suppliers
and contractors not to kill the golden goose as it were.
|